Every once in a while, I realize what a huge nerd I am. Though this is a label I proudly wear, sometimes I have to notice that the terms I toss around daily might as well be in ancient Estonian / Finnish to my non-classical friends. While you might not need a full Rosetta Stone course to grasp the language of classical music, we've all been through some kind of journey to pick up the jargon. If you can, think back to a time when you had never heard of terms such as "sonata form", "principal player" and "atonal music". Now those terms are crucial to even getting through most concert program notes! Living in Chicago brings us in contact with all kinds of different people - many who have no idea that in an orchestra there are two different sections for the violins. When it comes to explaining classical music, how do you get past the technicalities?
Not to generalize too much, but in my experience those who are lacking in knowledge about the arts are generally not lacking in knowledge of some sport. The other day I was talking to one of my friends about classical music and explaining how an orchestra works. He's a basketball dude whose idea of a Rondo is the point guard for the Boston Celtics. Our conversation focused on the topic of the conductor, "Anyone could do that, right? it doesn't look that hard... You just wave your arms around! Does the orchestra really need a conductor?". I realized some explanation was in order. I started talking about the complexity of parts in musical scores, importance of keeping the beat and guiding musical interpretation. My friend responded, "So... he's like the head coach. Calling the plays out to the key players". What a great analogy! I'm keeping that one to use for the future.
Making a foreign subject relatable and interesting has always been a challenge. When learning something new, people tend to gravitate toward comparisons with the familiar. Though sports and classical music are viewed as opposites and even pitted against each other in schools as they compete for funding and attention, the core values and goals of both groups are the same. The ideas of teamwork, leadership and work ethic apply to music just as much as they do to sports.
Talking to people who have no understanding of what we do can be frustrating, but keeping the commonalities in mind definitely helps bridge the gap. Of course this is not always the case: Recently in Charleston, my friend and I were trying to explain that we were in the city to play with the Spoleto Festival Orchestra. As we parted ways, the gentleman said, "Good luck with your a cappella group!". Perhaps some people just need some more time....
What are some of your most successful explanations of classical music to those unfamiliar with our world? When you're talking with someone who isn't even sure what your instrument is, where do you begin? Knowing how packed the red line can get coming back from Sox / Cubs games, I am sure there have been quite a few interesting run ins. I look forward to reading your thoughts and experiences!
Comments
Differences between sports and musical performance
Sat, 7/14/2012 - 8:37am — LEckerlingThere is much to be learned from an amazing athlete for a musician...particularly when it comes to the mental discipline/focus part of the job. Great athletes and great musicians share this. I think it is the most important similarity between sports and musical performance. But the ultimate goals are different. The goal of a sports event is to win. The goal of a musical performance is to share/communicate and transcend. That difference is huge. True, an athlete's performance can put an audience in "awe", and really move them. And we do have "competitions" in music (we shouldn't, in my opinion, but we do!). But at the end of the day, a musical performance is not about "winning". And that to me is the game changer. (I accidentally posted it anonymously)
Differences between sports and musical performance
Sat, 7/14/2012 - 8:22am — AnonymousThere is much to be learned from an amazing athlete for a musician...particularly when it comes to the mental discipline part of the job. Great athletes and great musicians share this. I think it is the most important similarity between sports and musical performance.
But the ultimate goals are different. The goal of a sports event is to win. The goal of a musical performance is to share/communicate and transcend. That difference is huge. True, an athlete's performance can put an audience in "awe", and really move them. And we do have "competitions" in music (we shouldn't, in my opinion, but we do!). But at the end of the day, a musical performance is not about "winning". And that to me is the game changer.
A Symphony as a competitive event?
Sun, 7/8/2012 - 6:21pm — Nick at Norton ...Years ago, composer Peter Schickele (aka; P.D.Q. Bach) recognized the similarities between sporting events and classical performances.
Here is one example of his view of the subject:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzXoVo16pTg
Sports goes even deeper
Sat, 7/7/2012 - 2:31pm — AnonymousYou could continue the conversation with sports. There's a great line from Miracle on Ice where Herb Brooks is talking about the elements of hockey. There is flow and momentum in a game. Go to the clip at about 1:40. The ebbs and flows are like dynamics.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YA03y3SpJ6Q&feature=related
There are reasons to with certain defensive or offensive formations depending on the skill set of players. Do you play a zone or man-man defense? Personnel are like the instrument players. Each has a part to play at different times, but work within an overall framework.
All sports have "movement breaks" whether it be innings, periods, games (for 7 games series), quarters, halves.
And of course people make mistakes. A little less obvious in orchestral music, but when mistakes are made, they are like errors or turnovers.
Wonderful elaboration!
Sat, 7/7/2012 - 7:08pm — Allegra MontanariThank you so much for your wonderful elaboration! I especially like your statements about the individual skill sets of players. Orchestral musicians, just like athletes, have to constantly find the balance of blending in / supporting the team and choosing the appropriate time to shine individually. A good conductor like a good coach understands the strengths of his team and knows how to bring the best out of each individual.
Additionally, the chemistry between the conductor and an orchestra as well as a coach and the athletes can greatly alter the performance of the group as a whole - regardless of the players' skill level.
One last thing... Although our muscles are being developed on a much smaller level, both succuessful professional athletes and professional musicians train with discipline unlike almost any other career. Whether it be scales or sprints - both workouts are pretty intense.
Thank you again for sharing your thoughts!
Post new comment