Lucy Shelton and eighth blackbird Present Sufficiently Bizarre "Pierrot"

Lucy Shelton and eighth blackbird Present Sufficiently Bizarre "Pierrot"

Thu, 12/10/2009 - 9:03pm — Tim Sawyier
Dec 10, 2009

Arnold Schoenberg’s 1912 “Pierrot lunaire” is a morbid work. The 21 poems that comprise its text address a number of cheery topics, from vampiric moths and the regurgitated blood of consumptives, to more light-hearted fare like black masses and how to smoke tobacco out of a skull. (Poem 19 relates a spectacle probably more familiar to modern listeners, that is, a clown playing the viola.)

 



eighth blackbird’s “Pierrot” at the Harris Theater more than lived up to the work’s intrinsic bizarritude. My jury is still out as to whether or not a barefooted Lucy Shelton done up in teal sequins cozying up to a (superlative) Australian flutist while the latter plays Schoenberg from memory enhanced the performance, or just went too far. I find the piece itself macabre enough as it is, without dressing it up with the bare light bulbs, unexplained ladder, and specious choreography in which eighth blackbird chose to drape it. Don’t get me wrong—it was a sight to be seen! But whether you’re supposed to hear a piece of music, or see it (especially one as iconic as “Pierrot”) is up for debate. Though however you dress it up, if at all, performing the whole thing from memory, and with the precision eighth blackbird did on Tuesday, is a sight to be heard.

 



The first half of the concert was also a slightly mitigated success. Anyone who has walked into the Harris Theater has no doubt been struck by its streamlined architecture, décor, lighting, etc. Transforming the black box interior of the theater itself into a smoky Weimar cabaret is no small feat, but one that eighth blackbird and Lucy Shelton pulled off. Shelton’s appropriately crass, unapologetic renditions of four Kurt Weill songs almost made you see cheap rouge on her cheeks, and a sensitive rendering of Alban Berg’s trio arrangement of the slow movement of his “Kammerkonzert” was a window into the zeitgeist of Weimar.

 



All in all, the evening was a thoughtfully constructed presentation of music that has had a profound influence on that of the last 75-100 years. I’m not sure if George Perle’s “Critical Moments 2,” with which eighth blackbird closed the first half, is necessarily the apotheosis of this legacy (its nine “sparse” movements sound about as much the product of an 85-year-old filling a commission as a conscientious compositional choice), but the fact that, as with “Pierrot,” eighth blackbird played the thing from memory more than compensated for the debatable quality of the piece itself. And whatever I have to say, it’s hard to argue with eighth blackbird’s two recent Grammy Awards…

Comments

visual, or not?

Tim,

There seems to be this ongoing debate whether music should be presented with any visual accompaniement. I think that horse has done left the barn, and in my opinion, rightly so. We live in a rich media environment, and the people who are going to be attending and consuming classical music in the future live in a full-time, on-demand visual world. Not every piece of music should have visual content, but I applaud eigth blackbird's effort to reinvent this work. Having read your review, I'm sorry I missed it!

Fantasia Fan

nothing to be said for traditionalism?

Dear Ms. Fan,

Thanks for posting! Did you know you have the same name as a Disney movie of animated shorts set to classical music? Weird.

Anyway, I'm afraid I simply fall on the conservative (pronounced "lame") side of that fence your horse apparently ran through. In my experience staging works that were not conceived for the stage (or screen) adds little to a performance, and distracts a lot from it. That movie I mentioned is a perfect case in point. Does "Rite of Spring" need dinosaurs to sound primeval? Do animated dinosaurs distort the intrinsic spirit and meaning of the piece? The fact that Stravinsky stormed out of the "Fantasia" premier suggests certain answers to those questions, ones with which I happen to agree. Good music is good music; it doesn't need to be "reinvented," and trying to do so is potentially deleterious, so why bother?

But hey, if kitsch gets people to concerts these days, let the good times role!

Lame??

Tim,

I would never call you (or anyone) lame for not liking visual content with your music. Merely a taste preference. And I have seen examples where it did detract from the experience. However, I have also seen examples where I felt that it really did provide a new and interesting twist to an old warhorse that was in need of a little reinvention. Like all arts endeavors, these things can be done well or poorly. Question. Have you ever seen one you liked?

FF